![]() 11/28/2016 at 01:51 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I WILL SPAM YOU WITH TURBO BUICKS, DEAL WITH IT.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:01 |
|
*does not deal with it*
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:04 |
|
Turbo Buick > V-tech.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:12 |
|
Let me show you how its done son
Also on you previous post GM does have an affordable performance car Turbo and V6 Camaro. Also just because its a manual doesnt make it performance and $34k for a slow turbo sedan is not affordable.
Side note the 1997 Regal GS boat is only 0.3 seconds slower to 60 than the GS AWD.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:14 |
|
HEY VTECH MAKES VERY DECENT LANDLINES.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:15 |
|
but sleeper factor, nobody now expects a Buick to be quick. People expect a Camaro to be fast.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:17 |
|
landlines are dying, home phones are being replaced with cell phones.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:21 |
|
*distracts opponent*
*blasts with wave after wave of vtec goodness*
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:23 |
|
Turbos buicks love to eat rice.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:31 |
|
I agree but 30k is not affordable. An Si, Fiesta ST, or BRZ at around 20K is. And even though I like GM, I have been critical of the fact that since the Cobalt SS and Solstice they havent really made anything new thats affordable performance when the Ford’s STs do so well
![]() 11/28/2016 at 02:56 |
|
![]() 11/28/2016 at 09:18 |
|
I’m OK with this.
![]() 11/28/2016 at 09:35 |
|
I would love to see the smackdown that the Type R would lay upon a GS.